The debate over the authorization of autonomous vehicles reveals a clash between progressive technology and conservative policy views.
The continuation of technological progress versus policy restraint has taken the form of a debate in Belgium about the admission of self-driving cars. The heart of this issue is the recent position of the Belgian Minister of Mobility, Georges Gilkinet, who does not want to allow self-driving cars with a high degree of autonomy on Belgian roads. The minister continues with this a brake on what is already a reality in Germany: drivers there can use 'level 3' autonomous vehicles on the highway, such as certain Mercedes models.
The views of Gilkinet seem at first glance to be driven by concerns about road safety, pollution and the desire to promote alternative modes of transport such as the train. He argues that self-driving cars contribute to traffic jams and air pollution as much as conventional cars and sees more benefit in using the train for long distances, where travelers can find peace and quiet.
These statements raise questions about the role of policymakers in steering technological innovation. While Gilkinet emphasizes the traditional disadvantages, the technology actually offers opportunities to improve driving behavior, as Stef Willems of Vias emphasizes. After all, computers are impervious to distraction and never drive under the influence of alcohol. In addition, it is believed that technological progress in the form of autonomous driving is inevitable and that this should receive more attention in the form of pilot projects.
The minister's policy therefore appears to be at odds with the technological reality in which other countries are making progress. Mercedes, which hoped to roll out its system in Belgium, now faces a closed door. The benefits of self-driving vehicles, which are underlined by experts, therefore appear to be underexposed in the Belgian context.
Meanwhile shout votes from the academic world, including Steven Latré of Imec, to start pilot projects to further develop self-driving technology. This call resonates with the need to thoroughly evaluate autonomous vehicles in all their complexity, from lane keeping assistance to full autonomy, which could even make the steering wheel or pedals redundant.
In contrast to the Belgian attitude, Latré emphasizes that level 5 self-driving cars, which already function as taxis in other countries such as the US, testify to the limitless potential of this technology. The introduction of such advanced systems will not be abrupt, but will have a steady development. The refusal to embrace this technology therefore appears to be a delay in inevitable progress.
While the Belgian Minister of Mobility maintains his position, the international consensus is growing that the future of transport will be autonomous. The question arises whether the position of a single minister should be decisive in a discussion that relies so heavily on future technological and social developments. Belgium is at a crossroads where policymakers have the choice to embrace the future or cling to the current state of affairs.
George Gilkinet
He always used his political commitment for greater justice, whether social, fiscal or democratic. As Deputy Prime Minister, he now supports the federal government, which is implementing the greenest program Belgium has ever known. As minister, he focuses heavily on mobility: mobility connects all Belgians.
Gilkinet comes from the association life sector and believes the bond between civil society, citizens and politics is essential. He prefers to decipher challenges together and look for solutions collectively, which he then rolls out with pleasure.