The call for change in mobility policy in cities and towns is growing louder, but not without resistance.
Self-employed people and entrepreneurs from various sectors are raising the alarm about the redevelopment of city centres and shopping streets. More and more parking spaces are disappearing and especially in cities where green parties are in power, they feel unheard. The problem is not only in commercial streets, cars are also increasingly banned from residential areas. It is a reality that many find difficult to accept, especially because the impact on their daily business operations can be great.
In many cities, the car-free design of the new market square is praised as a step forward. The squares are becoming more pleasant, more accessible for cyclists and pedestrians, and are getting a more attractive appearance. But the fact that these plans often also mean that cars are completely banned from certain streets goes too far for many entrepreneurs. They fear that customers will no longer be able to reach their shops. The same applies to residential areas where cars can only go as far as the edge of the neighbourhood, which poses challenges for families with young children and the elderly in particular.
One of the most common arguments against the car-free plans is the effect on the local economy. Many shopkeepers say that customers will drop out if they cannot easily park their car nearby. In response to these concerns, however, proponents of the plans argue that the safety of cyclists and pedestrians must come first. According to them, the idea that parents should be able to drive their car right up to the school gate is outdated. “We need to focus on a future where safety and sustainability are central,” say politicians. However, this vision is not shared by everyone.
social media
Discontent is not limited to the political arena, however. In the age of social media, it is easier than ever for citizens to express their opinions. Politicians who take measures to restrict cars are increasingly confronted with online intimidation and harsh criticism. The rise of “citizen journalism” plays a major role in this. People are more likely to reach for their smartphones to share their displeasure and portray politicians as villains. This trend is causing a hardened tone in the debate.
The pursuit of fewer cars and more shared mobility seems on paper a simple solution to the issues surrounding urban sustainability. However, the reality is more complex. The so-called 'mobility hubs', parking garages on the outskirts of cities where private cars, shared cars and logistics come together, could in theory offer a solution. However, it is still unclear whether this approach will actually produce the desired results in practice. The concerns of local entrepreneurs remain and the question is whether sufficient alternatives are offered.
The situation is similar in Flanders and the Netherlands. In Flanders, De Lijn, the most important public transport company, is implementing drastic changes. More than 3200 bus stops are disappearing. The situation in the Netherlands is not much better. The so-called 'transport poverty' is increasing, especially in rural areas. For many people, the car is no longer a luxury, but a pure necessity. "You cannot simply take this right away from people," is the message from various quarters. The elimination of parking spaces without offering sufficient alternatives is therefore causing a lot of criticism.
mobility debate
The mobility debate touches on multiple facets of daily life. On the one hand, there is the economic importance of accessibility for entrepreneurs. Without good accessibility, many fear for the survival of their business. On the other hand, the safety of cyclists and pedestrians plays an increasingly important role in urban policy. The question that arises from this is how these interests can be reconciled. Some policymakers try to find the golden mean, but it remains a delicate balance.
Despite the different perspectives, it seems clear that the current mobility transition is far from over. Whether it concerns car-free streets or a reduction in the number of parking spaces, every change in the urban landscape meets with resistance. Businesses and residents fear for their freedom and convenience, while proponents of the plans point to the urgent need to make our cities more sustainable and safer. A ready-made solution seems far away for the time being.
