Politics

Nationwide

  • Streets full of protest: the cabinet is investigating the limits of the right to demonstrate

    Vrijheid of veiligheid, er zijn nieuwe dilemma’s rondom het demonstreren in Nederland wat mobiliteit betreft.

    At a time when the boundaries of the right to demonstrate are increasingly being tested and sometimes even exceeded, the government announces an independent investigation into the adequacy of this right in the light of recent developments. This decision, announced by Ministers De Jonge of the Interior and Kingdom Relations and Yeşilgöz of Justice and Security, follows a series of protest actions that put pressure not only on traffic, but also other fundamental rights and national security.

    The right to protest is universally recognized as a fundamental pillar of a democratic society, but recent incidents have led to a reconsideration of how this freedom can be upheld without compromising other important rights. As Minister De Jonge emphasizes: “The right to demonstrate is crucial, but it does not provide a license to break rules and harm other interests.” He adds that current policy leaves little room for a weighing of interests between the right to demonstrate and other fundamental rights, which could undermine support for this right.

    Police speak to the demonstrators, while demonstrators are busy gluing here on the A12.

    From a safety perspective, highway occupations pose serious risks, not only to the protesters themselves but also to unsuspecting motorists. Sudden stops on highways can lead to accidents and, in some cases, serious injuries. In addition, such actions can block access to essential services such as hospitals and emergency services, posing a direct threat to public health.

    Minister Yeşilgöz also points out the need for this investigation, given the increase in protests that exceed legal limits and require excessive police deployment. Such actions divert resources from other necessary policing tasks and create significant disruptions in society. Examples of this include blocking highways, occupying airports and dangerous situations caused by arson along roads. This creates risky situations for motorists and hinders access to crucial services such as hospitals.

    VVD – Dilan Yeşilgöz-Zegerius

    “Vrijheid van meningsuiting en het recht op demonstreren zijn belangrijke grondrechten. Daar staat het kabinet pal voor. We zien dat het overgrote deel van de demonstraties goed verloopt, dankzij de inzet van het lokale gezag en de demonstranten zelf. In de afgelopen periode zien we echter in toenemende mate protesten waarbij de grenzen van de wet worden opgezocht en worden overschreden. Dat is niet alleen schadelijk, het vraagt ook een grote inzet van politieagenten die niet in de wijken hun belangrijke werk kunnen doen.”

    Minister Yeşilgöz of Justice and Security

    The research, to be conducted by the Scientific Research and Data Center (WODC), will focus on demonstrations where laws are deliberately violated and situations where other fundamental rights or national security are potentially threatened. In addition, comparative analyzes with other countries will be carried out to assess how they handle such demonstrations, what powers local and national authorities have to maintain order, and what safeguards are in place to protect the right to demonstrate.

    The focus will also be on demonstrations that take place in sensitive locations, such as politicians' homes or at abortion clinics, where the right to privacy may come into direct conflict with the right to demonstrate. In addition, it is examined how other countries deal with threats to national security that may arise from demonstrations.

    In these times of social and political tensions, it is clear that the balance between freedom of expression and other fundamental rights is a delicate matter that requires constant attention. The announced research is a step towards ensuring that the Netherlands maintains this balance, while at the same time remaining true to the basic principles of democracy.

Regional

  • Sustainable: the cargo bike is conquering the city, although local rules are slowing down growth

    The cargo bike, often seen as a symbol of sustainable city logistics, offers numerous advantages.

    More and more companies and self-employed people in large cities are exchanging their traditional vans for cargo bikes. This shift is mainly driven by increasing mobility problems and parking pressure in urban areas. Entrepreneurs choose cargo bikes not only for practical reasons, but also for ecological considerations, where a significant reduction in CO2 emissions is an important motivator.

    For small self-employed people such as plumbers and handymen, the cargo bike offers an efficient solution to navigate quickly and flexibly in the city. The package and meal delivery sector has also discovered the benefits. For example, an electric cargo bike can find a parking space more easily than a car and is often faster in city traffic.

    Despite these benefits, there are also challenges. The dimensions of the cargo bike, although more compact than those of vans, still require significant space on the often narrow urban sidewalks. This can lead to obstructions that are not only impractical, but can also damage the image of the company in question.

    The urban infrastructure sometimes lags behind this trend. Although the cargo bike offers many advantages, such as always parking close by and no fuel costs, it is sometimes a puzzle to find a suitable parking spot without hindering pedestrians.

    cargo roo
    Foto: © Pitane Blue – Cargoroo

    However, the challenge remains to adapt urban infrastructure to new forms of transport and to ensure a level playing field in the competition between providers of these innovative services.

    Another interesting aspect of the rise of the cargo bike is the increase in shared cargo bikes, such as those from Cargoroo. These services offer residents the opportunity to use cargo bikes in a flexible and sustainable way without having to be the owners themselves. However, the path to acceptance and integration in city districts is not always self-evident. 

    matter

    In a matter of licensing for shared cargo bikes, the preliminary relief judge has to find a delicate balance between the interests of the parties involved. The core of the conflict concerns the rejection of a permit application by a company, referred to in this context as the applicant, against the interests of the municipality, here referred to as the defendant, and a competing company, Baqme.

    The judge emphasized that the suspension of the refusal to grant a permit does not automatically mean that the permit would still be issued to the applicant. This is an important legal nuance, because simply suspending a negative decision does not immediately lead to a positive outcome for the applicant.

    The applicant has mainly justified its request for interim measures with the argument that this is necessary to offer investors a 'ray of hope'. She claims that the municipality's decisions could cause her financial problems within two months, which would have a serious impact on business operations. However, the preliminary relief judge found that these allegations were not sufficiently substantiated, especially because the applicant chose not to share business-sensitive information that could substantiate its financial situation.

    This decision by the preliminary relief judge illustrates the complexity of legal decision-making in situations where the interests of multiple parties are at stake. The judge pointed out that the applicant's current permit is still valid until June 15, 2024, and that the company could and should have reasonably anticipated the possibility that it would not automatically receive a new permit. This suggests an expectation of proactive risk management from companies in their business strategies.

    Furthermore, the judge ruled that compliance with the Additional Rules and the General Local Ordinance (APV) by the municipality is an important interest that serves to protect legal certainty. This importance is further reinforced by the involvement of a third party, in this case Baqme, whose rights and interests must also be safeguarded.